So, you probably remember this from the most recent episode of The Mentalist / Bones / Castle / Criminal Minds / Numb3rs:
SEXY YET PROFESSIONAL DETECTIVE: What have we got?
SASSY JUNIOR DETECTIVE: Nothing. All of our leads have dried up like Cher’s ovaries.
GRUFF SENIOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL: We’ve got to wrap this thing up. I’ve got the mayor breathing down my neck.
MAYOR: Hhhhhhhhhh. Hhhhhhhhhh.
G.S.L.E.O.: And now he’s drooling.
S.Y.P.D.: We’ll keep after it, but we’re a bit short-handed after half of the department was beheaded and, ironically, eaten by The Vegan Killer.
G.S.L.E.O.: I don’t want excuses. I want someone behind bars.
S.J.D.: You and my alcoholic ex wife.
SOCIALLY INAPPROPRIATE GENIUS: Actually, we know that the comptroller picked up his dry-cleaning on Wednesday. The same Wednesday that the chimney sweep showed up at the wedding in a curiously un-besooted pair of dungarees. Thus, the heiress was murdered by the delivery man who brought the Martinizing agents to the dry cleaners, also on Wednesday. Also, he was her half brother.
|Part of Figure 2D from the paper. In this case, the spatial range for co-occurrence is defined by s = 1.0 degrees (about 55 miles by 65 miles where I live). The different curves correspond to different time windows.|
The probability that two randomly selected Flickr users are friends is less than 1 in 7000 [Corrected. Original post said 1 in 700]. However, if two users have uploaded pictures from the same 1 degree by 1 degree region within a day of each other on five different occasions, there is nearly a 60% chance that they are friends. If they have done it more than eight times, the chance is more than 90%.
In other words, if you and your accomplice both upload photos from the same dry cleaner every Wednesday, even a non-genius will be able to figure out that you know each other. This is how Strangers on a Train will end in the 2032 remake starring Freddie Highmore and Abigail Breslin.
For those interested in mounting a futile defense against the Orwellian State, more information about geo-tagging and privacy can be found here, including ways in which you may inadvertently be sharing location information without meaning to.
Crandall, D., Backstrom, L., Cosley, D., Suri, S., Huttenlocher, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1006155107
2 thoughts on “Where stalkers become friends: Geo-tagging on Flickr”
I should really read the paper first, but what fun is that? What this suggests to me is that flickr is both an extraordinarily small social network (1 in 700 chance of a connection at random? that’s huge! The equivalent density for the general population would mean an average of about 2 million contacts per person in the US), and presumably therefore highly clustered. This will not scale, and the future of Stana Katic and her character is secure.
It is huge. Also a typo. I went back to check, and it should have read 1 in 7000. I have now corrected it in the blog.
Still, I think that your point holds, as that would be 200,000 contacts per person.